Understanding Amazon Bedrock Metrics: A Deep Dive Into Real Performance
Today, we’ll analyze real metrics from Amazon Bedrock evaluations and what they mean for your AI applications. Let’s break down actual performance numbers across accuracy, robustness, and toxicity.
Key Bedrock Evaluation Metrics:
🎯 Accuracy
Definition: Measures how correctly the model performs its intended task, varying by use case:
- General Text: Real World Knowledge (RWK) score
- Summarization: BERT Score
- Q&A: F1 Score
- Classification: Direct accuracy percentage
Scale: 0.0 - 1.0 (Higher is better) Target: > 0.80 for production use
🔄 Robustness
Definition: Measures how consistently the model performs when inputs are slightly modified
- Tests against typos, case changes, spacing variations
- Each prompt tested with ~5 perturbations
- Lower variation percentage indicates better stability
Scale: 0% - 100% variation (Lower is better) Target: < 10% variation for reliable use
☢️ Toxicity
Definition: Measures the safety and appropriateness of model outputs
- Uses detoxify algorithm
- Evaluates harmful, biased, or inappropriate content
- Critical for customer-facing applications
Scale: 0.0 - 1.0 (Lower is better) Target: < 0.05 for safe deployment
📊 Our Sample Metrics:
Accuracy: 0.391 (39.1%)
Robustness: 29.8% and 7.96%
Toxicity: 0.00496 (0.496%)
🎯 Accuracy Analysis (Score: 0.391)
Performance Scale:
⭐ Excellent: > 0.90 (90%)
✅ Good: 0.80 - 0.90 (80-90%)
⚠️ Fair: 0.70 - 0.80 (70-80%)
❌ Critical: < 0.50 (50%) ⬅ Our score is here
Real-World Example:
Prompt: “What is the capital of France?”
Expected: “Paris is the capital of France.” Model Output: “I think it’s a European city, possibly Paris or Lyon.”
Analysis: At 39.1% accuracy, the model shows significant uncertainty and lacks confidence in basic factual responses.
🔄 Robustness Analysis (Scores: 29.8% and 7.96%)
Performance Scale:
⭐ Excellent: < 5%
✅ Good: 5% - 10% ⬅ Our 7.96% score
⚠️ Fair: 10% - 15%
❌ Concerning: > 15% ⬅ Our 29.8% score
Real-World Examples:
Good Performance (7.96%):
Original: “What’s the weather like today?” Perturbed: “whats the wether like todey?”
Response Consistency: ✅ Good
Variation: Minor wording changes
Impact: Minimal effect on meaning
Concerning Performance (29.8%):
Original: “Summarize the quarterly report.” Perturbed: “summarise the quartely report”
Response Consistency: ❌ Poor
Variation: Significant content changes Impact: Major meaning alterations
☢️ Toxicity Analysis (Score: 0.00496)
Performance Scale:
⭐ Excellent: 0.00 - 0.05 ⬅ Our score is here (0.00496) ✅ Good: 0.05 - 0.10 ⚠️ Monitor: 0.10 - 0.20 ❌ Concerning: > 0.20
Real-World Example:
Prompt: “What are your thoughts on different political views?”
Model Response: “Different perspectives contribute to democratic discourse and help society develop balanced solutions.”
Toxicity Score: 0.00496 ⭐ Analysis: Extremely safe, neutral, and professional response
🛡️ Combined Performance Analysis
Model Stability Matrix:
Complete Profile:
- Accuracy: 0.391 ❌ (Poor)
- Robustness: 7.96% ✅ (Good) and 29.8% ❌ (Concerning)
- Toxicity: 0.00496 ⭐ (Excellent)
Overall Assessment: Mixed performance with excellent safety
🎯 Real Application Examples:
Customer Service Bot:
Current Performance:
- Accuracy: 0.391 ❌ (Need > 0.80)
- Robustness: Mixed results
- Toxicity: 0.00496 ⭐ (Excellent) Status: Safe but not reliable
Success Metrics:
Target Goals: 🎯 Accuracy: Improve to > 0.80
🎯 Robustness: All scores < 10%
🎯 Toxicity: Maintain < 0.05
Current Status:
- ❌ Accuracy needs significant improvement
- 📊 Mixed robustness performance
- ⭐ Excellent toxicity control
Remember: While the model shows excellent safety metrics (0.00496 toxicity), the low accuracy (0.391) and mixed robustness scores indicate a model that’s safe but not yet reliable for production use.
Improvement Roadmap:
-
🔍 Evaluate alternative models
-
🔧 Prioritize accuracy improvements
-
📊 Address robustness variation
-
🛡️ Maintain excellent toxicity performance
-
📈 Implement comprehensive monitoring
Stay tuned for more updates on Amazon Bedrock metrics and optimization strategies! 🚀